The Sports Dome
By now, you've probably heard about "The Dome" in Byron. Several weeks ago, City Council approved preliminary approval for the Sports Dome Project. This means that Council was interested enough in the project to authorize up to $2,000 to be spent in order to prepare a feasibility study and find answers to the remaining questions.However, it is worth noting that approval came only after nearly an hour of intense questioning by nearly all members of the City Council. We had many questions and concerns for Mr. Colby, the developer proposing the project.
What is the Dome?
The dome is very large, consisting of enough space that two softball fields would be contained inside. The field could be modified to accommodate other sports, but the primary source of revenue (as proposed) would be softball leagues and tournaments. Attached to the dome (on one side) would be 2 restaurants to serve tournament players and their families. Imagine a two-story wall of glass on one side of the dome with restaurant seating over-looking the fields.
In addition to the dome and 2 restaurants, the project also consists of a year-round driving range and golf club assembly shop. They also plan to build a sports hostel (small rooms with bunk beds and common shower areas) to accommodate traveling teams. A larger hotel is planned for a future phase of the project.
Why did you vote for it?
First, let me stress that my vote was only for preliminary approval. The developer still needs to come back to City Council with answers to my questions in order to receive final approval on the project. Originally, this was scheduled to be on the agenda for 3/25/09, but I've heard they are not ready to present. The agenda for next week's meeting should be posted here sometime tomorrow (Friday).
As you probably know, I'm an entrepreneur. I enjoy taking calculated risks to grow if/when the opportunity makes sense. When presented with the dome opportunity, I was intrigued enough to at least have the rest of my questions answered to see how viable the project may be.
If successful, a project like this would bring additional jobs to our area. In addition, the steady flow of visitors to our town (for weekend tournaments) would bring an influx of revenue and eventually the need for a hotel. With Somerby hosting weddings almost every weekend during the summer, a hotel would definitely be an added benefit to the people who visit our town. A hotel creates additional jobs and additional tax revenue.
Additional revenue through this complex adds to our tax base. A larger tax base means we can spread the costs of much needed projects over a larger tax base. For me, that was worth spending some time to research the potential viability of the project before taking a negative position on the project.
What don't you like about it?
I've heard from many residents over the past two weeks and nearly every one of them has said the same thing.
It's Too Risky.
True, there is enormous risk in a project like this. After all, they are requesting that the city issue an appropriations bond for the construction of the dome. While the figures presented to Council show that the dome would have sufficient cash flow to cover the bond payments, it's still a risk. I understand that. If the dome doesn't bring in sufficient revenue to cover the costs (as projected, see Pages 34 & 35), we have to be able to cover the bond payments.
To be fair, keep in mind that the developer also has $6.5 million of his own money involved with the project (restaurants, roads, etc). They have a vested interest in the success of the dome, because without the teams playing in the dome there won't be patrons eating at his restaurants.
I can also assure you that I've made many phone calls trying to verify the revenue assumptions with highly educated people "in the know" about a dome such as this. All seemed to think it was "do-able" with the right management team in place. However, I have additional concerns on the expenditure side. Frankly, I don't think it's realistic to heat/cool a dome of this magnitude for only $25,000 per year. I would need written proof from the dome manufacturer and People's Coop before I'd feel comfortable with this figure.
So what happens now?
The Colby Group will need to come back before City Council and ask for final approval to begin the project. Based on the answers they provide, they may or may not receive enough votes to continue. With the amount of public outcry against this project, I'm not sure the community is ready to take on a project of this magnitude. Nor am I sure that the city should. As you know, I'm a pro-business guy, but I tend to draw the line when you start asking for government assistance. Generally speaking, if something is a really great idea you can usually find lots of people who are willing to fund your project (for a cut of the profits, of course).
Personally, Mr. Colby will have a hard time convincing me that this project will cash flow enough to cover the bond payments. Even if I feel comfortable that it will cash flow, there is still the underlying question of whether or not city should even be involved with it.
Your Thoughts?
I'm interested to hear your thoughts on this project, both positive and negative. Please leave your comment below. Alternatively, you can contact one of your City Council Members directly.
Disclaimer: Articles posted on ByronMNBlog.com are the opinions of Councilman Alan De Keyrel only and do not reflect the opinion of the Byron City Council or the City of Byron. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be deemed accurate until verified.
Was this information forwarded to you by a friend? Subscribe Here
Labels: byron mn, dome, softball dome
10 Comments:
Thank you very much for keeping the residents updated on the dome. As a member of the Rochester Amateur Sports Commission I am a strong supporter of youth athletics. There is definitely a need for a dome in the area to provide year round opportunities for our athletes. However; I am concerned that this group has not done their research and needs "mom and dad" to cosign the loan. In regards to the add on features, as a hotel manager for many years I find it extremely difficult to believe that they would be able to survive economically with only weekend business. Sorry, but I don't see Byron as the hot bed for corporate or leisure travel during the weekdays which means who is filling the beds on Sunday through Thursday? If you have the opportunity please look into other domes with restaurants attached (if they exist). After many years working the sports market from the hospitality side of things I do not feel confident that the teams will stay at the complex to eat. And again, what about the weekdays? Can Byron residents support the restaurant during the weekday to keep it profitable? I really see another big dream like Byron Towne Square. And I see every day how well that did. I am extremely relieved to find that you are very cautious and will give this your highest level of consideration.
Kristine Ihrke
I would like to echo the sentiments of Ms Ihrke. I see a very ambitious project on the table from this developer, but I am having a hard time envisioning Byron becoming the hub of sports activity to keep this project funded.
We have a lot on our tax-payer backs lately. Bonuses for AIG execs, bailing out banks and car companies, and the list goes on. Call me old fashioned, but if a business wants to do a project they should be accountable for it - without any "bailout" if it doesn't work as planned.
Thanks Mr. De Keyrel for your creating this venue for communication on Byron topics. For those of us with schedules that do not allow direct participation in city discussions, this is the next best thing!
Best regards,
Josh Pankratz
Reasons Why the Dome Will Not Work
For restaurants to cash flow they have a formula called an occupancy ratio. In MN, the average is 4% to 6% of the gross sales. The formula takes into consideration the rent, property taxes and insurance. Since I am not sure what is covered by the rent, I will on the low side and use 3%. At there proposed rent of $20,625 per month you would have to have sales of $8,250,000 per year. Since there are 2 restaurants you would have to double that to $16,500,000. Impossible for this area. With these restaurants not being able to survive, you have lost $41,250 per month (or $495,000/year) in revenue. How do you make that up? You can't!
They say 6 games/day x's 2 fields at $100/game x 32 weeks. How many teams will be able to play Monday through Friday during the day? How many sponsors will be able to afford $100/game for 32 weeks.
They say 16 teams/weekend x's $200 for 42 weeks. How many sponsors or team members are going to be able to afford this?
They say $28,125 per year in utilities. Look at your own bills at home. They have to heat and cool an area that size. No way.
City sold this group property for $1.00 and they turned around and mortgaged it for 1 million dollars. What happened to Knowledge Top? Do you want to do business with this group again?
These are a few examples of why this is so far fetched it should not even consider your time.
Thank you for your time.
First I really like the updates you have been sending out I don't always have time to sit and read the paper.
Second I think this sports dome thing NOW is a bad idea even if we do approve it who now is spending money on extras? " going out to eat, sports, recreation" I have a daughter that plays soccer and hockey both have seen cuts in the amount of people going out for these sports Dodge county had to salvage one girls hockey team together last year and it showed people are not spending. The thought of doing this and hearing people talk about closing the pool, not opening the Ice rink, road project not being done is a joke. we need to finish what we start. Nice Industrial park that was sure profitable built when things were moving too.
Thanks for your time
This post has been removed by the author.
Alan,
I like your position on this so far. Byron could definitely use a "Wow" factor. In spite of its proximity to West Circle Drive, Byron is virtually falling off the Greater Rochester map. Anything that would draw traffic to Byron might help remind Rochester residents how close this community is, and that could result in a better influx of consumer dollars.
On the other hand, I think your skepticism is completely warranted; because Byron residents and businesses are already taxed nearly to the breaking point. Some of the amibitions for this project seem like a bit of a stretch; and the last thing Byron needs is an inflated rubber dome that blows up in its face.
Sam Hurne
Look, this city has gone thru years of far fetched ideas that haven't panned out and cost us time and lots of money. It's time to develop a real Economic development plan that will create space for new business along the visibility of the Highway 14. As an entrepreneur you should appreciate that there are many great ideas out there from people desiring to get into business that cannot afford to purchase land, build and then fund a small business. Those costs are enormous. What ever happened to the downtown philosophy? Or are we simply lining the pockets of developers, not from Byron, by assisting them with securing loans they can default on? Talk to Jerry, or Mr. Farr. I'm sure they can get you up to speed on this topic.
That's great that you're an entrepreneur, just don't do it with my money. If the domes are a good idea, get investors. I hope you all make a million dollars.
Meanwhile, tend to maintaining Byron's pathetic infrastructure, keep up the parks, get law enforcement on patrol, etc.
I haven't talked to anyone that thought this was a great idea. It came off as a joke, but I just became aware of the 4 million dollar bond that this was going to cost us. What would happen if it failed? If the developers and investers think this is such a great, profitable venture.....let them get the 4 million dollars. I don't think I need to co-sign this loan.
Hum.......what would happen if the economy fell through the bottom?
The "normal working class" citizens of Byron cannot afford to be taxed further. We need to look at the general items that affect the everday working class, not the upper class. In regard to Mr. Rud's road improvements, we need to keep the large weight vehicles on the service roads in place of using the city streetswhenever possible. I was under the impression that is what the service roads are for. Improve them effectively so they do not need to have dips and valleys each spring, and keep the bulk milk trucks, semi trucks off 4th St NW, and have them use the westservice road for the majority of their travel through town. I understand trucks need to enter the Middle School, however, what is wrong with them using the service road and approach from the west to get there, in place of the majority of travel on 4th street. Is the service road not built for the heavy weight vehicles? It seems like the semis going to Schmidt printing have no problem with it. Let's help prevent the roads from breaking down in town if there is another solution that saves the taxpayers dollars.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home